Medical Russian Roulette

I've always felt that taking a Covid 'vaccine' was like playing Russian Roulette. In November of 2021 I used the image above and wrote,

Anyone who has seen the heart breaking video of 23 year old Casey Hodgkinson will know that the jab isn't risk free. She's not the only one who has had this particular adverse reaction, but is the worst in New Zealand so far.

You can't click on the original link I included above taking you to Casey's story. YouTube (big tech) has likely removed it. Was this at the request of the New Zealand Government or off-their-own-bat? At the very least it seems that too many people and institutions have decided they don't want you to know what is possible when you get those jabs. Just as well there are alternative platforms (for now), eh? You can watch young Casey talk about her experience here. Her neurological condition isn't resolving, by-the-way, but getting worse.

Something that has always irritated me, to put it mildly, was when those who got jabbed, but were seemingly OK, denied the injuries/death of others. People like Casey are human beings and they don't deserve to be gas-lit nor treated as sacrificial 'collateral damage'. This was a young life stolen!  

If you got through unscathed...at least in the short-term (Medsafe stated their concern there's no long term safety data), there was an element of luck involved. In an article published in Trial Site News they detail a recent Danish study, which found that the safety of the Pfizer mRNA jab was likely batch-dependent. They write,  

A trio of Danish researchers led by high powered physician-investigator Peter Riis Hansen, Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herleve and Gentofe recently had a research letter published in peer reviewed journal European Journal of Clinical Investigation. Titled “Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine,” the investigators found three groupings of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination batches with low, medium and high rates of adverse events. According to TrialSite contributor Dr. David Wiseman, “Is this modRNA degradation or DNA contamination.” The findings may correspond to Sasha Latypova contributions to TrialSite concerning various levels of vaccine safety associated with batches.

As mentioned in the quote above, the Danish researchers aren't the only ones working in this space. Dr. Latypova (min. 2.35 - 19.30 below) details her own path of increasing concern over product quality from first looking at vaccine injury/death data in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) versus manufacturing Lot Numbers. This is her area of expertise. Latypova noticed that some lots had few injuries recorded (1 - 10) while others had 6,000 and within that could be 300 deaths.

When you see something like this you know immediately there's something really bad going on in manufacturing and these products are not CGMP [good manufacturing practice law] compliant because the variability is outside the range of statistically controlled processes we have for quality control. This should be flagged. Normally these products get recalled...

Latypova's second area of analysis came from leaked documents of Pfizer's chemistry manufacturing controls and their application to the European Medicines Agency. The leaked documents still haven't been publicly released, but showed that during the approval process objections were raised by reviewers over Pfizer meeting GMP compliance. As Latypova shows in her first level analysis above, the manufacturing concerns have not been resolved. She also states that manufacturing facilities were not inspected by the FDA at the time of vaccine approval.

Latypova's third area of analysis relates to US Laws and how these products were rolled out under Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) as a "countermeasure." In short, EUA means that GMP legislation didn't apply. There's nothing stopping them manufacturing a variable product that can injure or kill and even two years later that status quo remains. It explains why there was no recall, despite mounting safety signals in systems like VAERS, around the world.

Latypova goes on to detail when the FDA did begin manufacturing inspections in 2021 and how most manufacturers were in violation of the standards. Worryingly, she states there has been no enforcement to make the manufacturers meet the standards in addition to being afforded immunity from liability. She concludes that because the EUA status hasn't changed the manufacturers have continued with poor manufacturing processes creating a variable product with the ability to injure and kill.

The Danish authors concluded that more research needs to be done. All researchers draw that conclusion. It's a plea for further research funds to be made available. I also want to know who, despite clear safety signals in systems like VAERS, which only captures 1 - 5% of actual adverse events, made the decision to not recall and accept unacceptable levels of casualty, including for children as young as 6 months.  

People like young Casey, with her whole life ahead of her, were healthy and not at risk from the virus itself. She's been damaged for life. She trustingly got the jab because our Government and her employer specified this was a requirement and repeatedly told her it was "safe and effective." Casey is still alive to tell her story. Other's have had to leave it to formal pathology reports to tell their story.

In the very least the analysis of Dr. Latypova and the Danish study is providing some explanation as to why some people were badly impacted and others not. It also goes some way to explaining why some families, especially if they all went and got jabbed together, all suffered adverse events of some description, including serious adverse events.

Batch numbers and poor manufacturing processes are only part of the story and we can't make assumptions. Some world-class medical professionals have legitimately asked if people were lucky when they got a degraded product, versus the product of full strength mRNA or as Latypova believes, fragments of mRNA, which she states are especially dangerous. In addition to manufacturing issues, are there cumulative effects? That is, the more shots you get the more damage is done?

What we can say with certainty right now is that Governments forced people, quite literally, to gamble with their lives. They stripped us of rights protected under human rights legislation via mandates and passes, social pressure and coercion with threat to livelihoods. They withheld information resulting in not one person who got those jabs being afforded legally required Informed Consent. This was medical Russian Roulette.