Watching Dominoes Fall

There's a saying, the truth inevitably outs. For the last two years we've lived in a state of swirling confusion not knowing who to believe; from the origins of the virus to the efficacy and safety, or lack thereof, of those jabs.

I used to have a subscription to The Australian, Australia's premier masthead publication. Used to being the operative words. I distinctly recall my comments disappearing if I mentioned the possibility that the virus may have originated in a lab and not a wet market. My reasoning at the time for coming to this conclusion was based on bits of knowledge and logic. Interestingly, around the same time in October 2020 (just in time for the Presidential election) The Australian was also disappearing any mention of that "laptop from hell." It was "Russian Disinformation" don't you know? Actually, that was the disinformation and corporate media obediently sucked it up and played along.

If the wet market origin hypothesis was true and they were that dangerous, why did they not close them down? They're all back in business, including in Wuhan and despite the stated risks. Contrast this with intelligence reports observing hazmat attired people busy at the Wuhan Coronavirus Lab at the end of 2019 where, coincidentally, they happened to be fiddling with this particular coronavirus. There were early reports that 3 lab scientists had come down with this mysterious respiratory illness.

There was a Wuhan eye doctor, Li Wenliang, who tried to warn the world. He was told by police to "stop making false comments" and was investigated for "spreading rumours".  He died after contracting the virus whilst treating patients. Around the same time Tedros, Director General of the WHO, was dutifully parroting the CCP line that this virus wasn't transmissible to humans. China exported it to the world having first shut down borders around Wuhan to stop it spreading to the rest of China. Tedros is in that role because he was nominated by Xi JingPing. Clearly an investment that paid off for the CCP.

This might all be history but it is relevant context and therefore worth revisiting because this isn't over even as the virus becomes endemic. Further moves are being made that would grant the WHO and other global institutions unprecedented power with the ability to usurp nations' sovereignty (and democracy) in the name of a future 'health emergency'.

Dr Rob Malone has written a timely, important, albeit chilling assessment of the geopolitical chess moves underway, whilst we're all distracted with royal funerals and the tribulations of Megs and Harry. It's the globalist camp's next step in their quest for total power and control. Lucky for us, so far the African leaders are seeing the play to seize sovereignty and are standing firm.

Monumental effort went in to convincing the world that the origins of Covid-19 wasn't a lab but a bat in a wet market. No patient zero at the wet market was ever identified. News papers like The Australian clamped down and censored as did Big Tech. The official narrative that was drummed into us was, it's the wet market, silly, and anyone saying otherwise was a tin foil hat conspiracy theorist. That is what people were quite literally 'trained' to think and say.

I get it. Many people didn't (and still don't) want to contemplate the awful reality that someone, somewhere was playing God with viruses and potentially making a biological weapon capable of killing millions of people. Shouldn't this kind of dangerous gain of function research be banned? As it happens, it was banned by the Obama Administration in 2014. The article linked suggests that they overturned the ban just before Obama left office and Trump took over as POTUS. If indeed this last bit is true, this would add a whole other layer to what is already deeply disturbing.

This brings me to the first domino that's already falling.

Anyone paying attention might have watched the often tense exchanges between Dr. Anthony Fauci and Senator Dr. Rand Paul. Over many months of hearings Senator Paul has pressed Fauci on whether he, as Director of the NIH, funded either directly or indirectly, gain of function research on bat coronaviruses. Dr Fauci has repeatedly denied the allegations, often playing games with semantics and telling Senator Paul (a medical doctor himself) that he doesn't know what he's talking about.

Dr Robert Redfield, a longtime virologist and former CDC Director has recently gone public saying that he's had his suspicions for a long time and that Fauci clearly misled Congress over the origins of Covid 19. So despite the mud slinging and character assassinations, the usual playbook by the usual suspects, Senator Paul was on to it. No matter how much Fauci has dodged and weaved to evade accountability, it is evident that the NIH did indeed fund this risky research via a third party called EcoHealth Alliance, headed up by one Peter Daszak. From a Vanity Fair article,

On Wednesday, the NIH sent a letter to members of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce that acknowledged two facts. One was that EcoHealth Alliance, a New York City–based nonprofit that partners with far-flung laboratories to research and prevent the outbreak of emerging diseases, did indeed enhance a bat coronavirus to become potentially more infectious to humans, which the NIH letter described as an “unexpected result” of the research it funded that was carried out in partnership with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

EcoHealth Alliance maintains that the work the Wuhan lab did on enhancement of a bat coronavirus to become potentially more infectious to humans (AKA gain of function) could not possibly have caused the outbreak. In fact, Daszak was the man that Dr. Fauci sent in to investigate how this pandemic got started. Daszak naturally concluded that when it came to the lab hypothesis, there was nothing to see here and it was the wet market, silly. "Demonstrably false" was how NIH Director Francis Collins (now conveniently retired as the hard questions get asked) responded to any suggestion this gain of function research could have started the pandemic.

Well, he, Fauci and Daszak would say that. They're all potentially culpable!

It gets worse. Recent revelations made by Professor Jeffrey Sachs in the Telegraph suggest that the virus may have actually originated in the US.

Leaked proposals showed that scientists from the University of North Carolina, EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology had applied for funding to insert an FCS into a Sars-like virus less than two years before the pandemic. The funding request was turned down by the US Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) who warned it was unsafe.

Writing in the journal, Prof Sachs and Prof Harrison said: “We do not know whether the insertion of the FCS was the result of natural evolution…or was the result of a deliberate introduction of the FCS into a Sars-like virus as part of a laboratory experiment. “We do know that the insertion of such FCS sequences into Sars-like viruses was a specific goal of work proposed by the EHA-WIV-UNC partnership within a 2018 grant proposal that was submitted to Darpa. “The 2018 proposal to Darpa was not funded, but we do not know whether some of the proposed work was subsequently carried out in 2018 or 2019, perhaps using another source of funding.”

Naturally the CCP have been happy to promote this line of inquiry and highlight America's alleged role in unleashing a deliberately enhanced virus. In the very least the picture that is emerging isn't the one so many were led to believe.

Dr Redfield goes on to say that "everyone had to agree to the narrative" pushed by Fauci and other health officials that the virus came from a wet market in Wuhan in 2019 and not the Wuhan Lab. Dr Redfield goes on to say

Fauci “may have overplayed his hand when he was so aggressive with Congress, saying that he was never involved in funding gain of function research", referring to the controversial research to genetically alter an organism to enhance certain biological functions including transmissibility. “There’s too much evidence that’s just not true.”

“Fauci knows that he’s funded this research. He also knows that he misled Congress. They’re in protection mode."

Misleading Congress is a crime in itself, although sadly it seems that if people belong to a particular political party, they can lie with impunity.

The wet market narrative is looking increasingly like it was deliberate disinformation to hide culpability and to misdirect thus buying those responsible valuable time. Consider that a comprehensive and coordinated campaign was run to smear, denigrate and censor anyone who may have been getting close to the truth. This was done with a complicit corporate media and big tech. It's no wonder that trust in both is at an all time low! They appear to exist to push a political 'narrative' and protect the interests of a powerful elite, not to inform impartially or even be investigative journalists. How are our corporate media any different from those in places like China, North Korea, Russia?

There are so many questions that need to be answered. Millions of people died, economies were trashed, businesses destroyed, jobs lost, children's education sacrificed, normal medical screening and procedures suspended and people forced to take an experimental medication leaving many more either dead or harmed.

1. Did the Obama Administration overturn their 2014 ban on gain of function just before Trump took office? If yes, why?
2. When and where exactly was this virus created?
3. When and how did this virus (a potential bioweapon) make its way to China?
4. Where did they get the funding for this?
5. When exactly was the mRNA jab to treat Covid-19 first developed?
6. Who was responsible for the demonisation campaign of existing antivirals that had a long history and well known risk profile?
7. Did Fauci and any others responsible for approving the novel gene based (mRNA) medications benefit financially - did they or anyone close to them have stock in pharmaceuticals such as Moderna, Pfizer, J&J, AstraZeneca?

Question 4 we already know the answer to. There's documentary evidence that funding for this risky research was signed off on by Fauci. The purpose of question 5 is to determine whether the jab was designed pre-pandemic. This would suggest other agendas were in play and whether the virus got out before they were ready, or whether it was 'released' deliberately? Scientists have apparently found a Moderna patented genome sequence in the Sars-CoV-2 virus. From the Daily Mail report on this finding:

Fresh suspicion that Covid may have been tinkered with in a lab emerged today after scientists found genetic material owned by Moderna in the virus's spike protein. They identified a tiny snippet of code that is identical to part of a gene patented by the vaccine maker three years before the pandemic. It was discovered in SARS-CoV-2's unique furin cleavage site, the part that makes it so good at infecting people and separates it from other coronaviruses.

The Moderna CEO is yet to elucidate on how this came to be. Surely this is worth investigating?

Question 6 and 7 are related to #5. The only way those jabs could get Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) is if no other treatment was available. Discrediting existing out of patent and therefore cheap medications was worth tens of billions of dollars if the jabs were mandated.

I've always had a sneaking suspicion that Dr. Fauci wasn't the hero he's actively encouraged the corporate media to portray himself as. Rather, he's shaping up to be more like the epidemiological equivalent of the fire-fighter who is actually the arsonist. While this post is focussed on what happened in America, it is relevant to Australia and New Zealand. The world took their cue from Dr Fauci, the CDC and the FDA.

The truth is emerging bit-by-bit thanks to the relentless focus of people like Senator Paul and others. Fauci has already announced his retirement as of January 2023, like Collins. He knows that the Republicans are likely to take control after the mid-terms this November. However, retirement won't save either of them from an inevitable investigation and potential prosecution. I'm hopeful we'll see the other key dominoes fall in the not too distant future.